1. It Was Not an Organic Movement • The vast majority of women were against suffrage. There were anti-suffrage protests. The ideals were unpopular among women. Just like today it was a loud minority of radicals pushing things normal people don’t want. Anti-suffrage protesters correctly predicted that pushing women into the political sphere would cause the breakdown of family, division in marriage and a shift from focus on kids and community. In The History of Women’s Suffrage, Susan B Anthony says herself in the first chapter, women didn’t want to be liberated or have suffrage and it wasn’t because they thought freedom was scary and that they loved their servitude. She said it was because women enjoy the privilege and protection that was granted to them under male suffrage. They had a lot of comforts and protections they would lose, they had everything they wanted. She has also been quoted saying “women’s liberation would have never happened if we left it up to women because they are too family oriented and too conservative.” Ironically, because most women didn’t want the vote and referendums were held, suffragettes actually blocked women’s referendums meaning they wouldn’t let women vote on whether they wanted to vote! One anti-suffrage poster from 1915 New York lists privileges that women gained under male suffrage and that they didn’t want to lose: women weren’t required to contribute to support a family, she may work and earn money as she pleases, may own personal property and dispose of it without her husband’s knowledge and consent, the husband cannot dispose of real estate without the wife’s consent, the wife cannot be required to pay husband’s bills even if contracted for support of family, the husband must pay the wife’s bill whether for family or personal expenses, if wife obtains divorce husband must pay alimony, if husband obtains divorce even if wife’s fault, he receives nothing. Women exempt from military service, and jury duty, husband may be criminally prosecuted if he doesn’t support his wife. • The CIA funded the first explicitly feminist magazine ‘Ms. Magazine’ as a way to influence American culture. Gloria Steinem was recruited by CIA out of college and became the Greta Thunberg for feminism (more on this by Dave McGowan in his book ‘Weird Scenes from the Canyon’). Interesting front cover when you consider the goddess worship that came with the original feminists, Gloria Steinem had a hand in this as well (theosophist). In 1977, reporter Karl Bernstein wrote an article for Rolling Stone called The CIA and the Media. Which detailed findings by a congressional inquiry called the Church committee, which found that around 400 journalists were considered assets by the CIA, including one called Catherine Graham, the owner of the Washington Post. Direct violation of CIA charter, to not domestically spy. Operation Mockingbird. British historian Francis Stoner Saunders wrote in 1999 “whether they liked it or not, whether they knew it or not, there were few writers, poets, artists, historians, scientists or critics in postwar Europe whose names were not in some way linked to this covert enterprise.” 2. Women’s History has Been Rewritten The Wage gap is a myth. Women were granted equal pay in Australia in 1969 (Workplace Relations Act). The discrepancy that feminists point to is a calculation that adds all annual salaries of full time, year-round workers, then finds the median salary for each gender and these are the figures that are compared. Doesn't factor in hours worked, women taking more time off for kids, career choice, men do more dangerous jobs, construction, sports, mining, car sales. Scandinavian countries with the most egalitarian policies find that the difference in occupations according to gender get even bigger. Because the 2 genders freely and organically and naturally choose very different roles because men and women are you guessed it, very different.
• The advent of women’s studies as an academic field is thanks to the Ford foundation and the Rockefeller foundation.
• And ever since it began as an academic field, the history of women has been distorted, retold and falsified due to inherent bias.
You know the funny part? They admit it! It is called standpoint feminist theory-a justification for reinterpreting historical facts (created by radical feminist Sandra Harding). It is part of a post-modern philosophy on truth.
Their narrative is that women throughout history have been oppressed and abused, they couldn’t own land or have careers or choose spouses. Trapped in marriages and forced to give birth until they die. Oh, and also apparently weren’t allowed to be educated. Keep in mind, all of this is reinforced through popular culture (Hollywood).
Professor Joseph Miller wrote a big academic piece on this corruption of history. He took the top 13 textbooks from the Victorian period to now in women’s history and found they had written out large portions on purpose. James Lindsay is another critic of the theory and even its use in the hard sciences.
• The witch trials are used to support the oppression narrative
What most people know of the witch trials comes from Hollywood which has clear agendas.
Author, feminist and second-generation witch Kristin Sollee is one of many feminist witch scholars who basically concede that what the Christians accused witches of was true, they just disagreed that it was a punishable offense.
But according to Malcolm Gaskill, “it is clear the witch-craze was essentially a secular legal phenomenon.”
• We have clear cases of women defying the narrative
Christine de Pizan was a French poet in the 14th century. She wrote books to support her and her family, very well educated by her father and wrote 2 best selling books considered to be feminist masterpieces. How does a free, independent hard-working woman fit into the dystopian historic nightmare of feminists? She was commissioned by the Royals to write pieces on a variety of topics, not oppressed! Is this some strange exception? Nope!
Mary Wollstonecraft is another example of a revolutionary writer who hung out in almost exclusively male intellectual circles with other contemporary thinkers.
And both Mary and Christine expressed frustrations that the women around them were content and happy with their lives. They were free to pursue things other than family but they DIDN’T WANT to.
Women in ancient Egypt could own property and sign contracts. They had multiple female rulers, as far back as 1800BC.
In ancient Sparta, they owned significant amounts of land.
In ancient Greece there were female mathematicians, astronomers, philosophers.
Ancient Persian women could own and inherit property and have occupations outside the home including management positions over both genders.
Roman women could also own land and businesses and obtain divorces.
In the European Middle Ages. Middle class women owned and ran businesses and could own or inherit property.
90% of women in New England could already read by 1750.
• Feminists conveniently ignore the incredible power women have always had via their sexuality
Men have always had to compete for mates. Only about 40% of all men who have ever lived have been successful at passing on their genes, compared with 80% of all women.
Even in the case of arranged marriages, only the most successful men are selected. In cases where women are the choosers, the pressure on men is even more brutal.
Women are notoriously more discriminating when choosing mates. Completely backed up by scientific literature. A large majority of women are unwilling to date men shorter than them. With many preferring men over 6ft. as well as lofty standards on how deep a man’s voice should be, how often he smiles, how much hair he must have, and how much money he makes. While men’s standards have notoriously been much lower.
It destroyed a natural power balance, men build everything and sustain it, while women create and nurture and decide/control reproduction-that was their power.
• Feminists also ignore the difficulties for men throughout history
The Chivalry code as outlines by scholar Leon Gautier in 1891. Pretty much just men protecting women and children and laying down their lives for justice (think of the titanic). This code was a general cultural idea that shaped the modern idea of gentlemanly behavior. But of course, it’s been absolutely demonized by feminists, regarding it as a doctrine of toxic masculinity.
Historical life for men was no walk in the park either. They forget that under feudal systems, rights were not split along line of gender. Men were not in possession of rights across the boards denied to women, and whatever rights were afforded also came with responsibilities that they might have liked to have traded for protections that women were afforded that men were not.
• Not only do they lie about the history of women and what they could and couldn’t do, but they ignore/downplay the extremely questionable lives of the early feminists and what inspired them.
3. Its Underpinnings Are Occultic
• When Rachel Wilson began researching for her book, she assumed she would mostly be looking into powerful elite who finance feminism in the west, little did she know she would discover underlying religious systems that underpinned the movement. “I had no idea the extent to which esoteric religious beliefs motivated the early feminists. And as I went down the research rabbit hole for almost 2 years, I discovered that this never changed.”
• Huge uptick in goddess worship and witchcraft with the rise of feminism
One reason is because there is no set dogma. Solitary, individualistic practice is common, it’s naturally anti-authoritarian making it extremely attractive to young women who have been told all their lives that societal institutions are oppressive.
And also, because feminism left a huge spiritual void after demonizing Christianity.
And yet another reason that is true but unpopular to say comes again from Rachel Wilson “Women, as beings of emotion and intuition, tend to get drawn into occult practice with ease…” as well as “no matter where you look in places where witches or feminists gather, one is never divorced from the other.” It is very popular comedic trope that middle aged women go to psychics and use horoscopes, because it’s a real observation.
Dianic wicca, the most widely practiced, named after roman goddess Diana is a tradition based on American feminist philosophy in the 70’s by Zsuzsanna Budapest who founded the Susan B Anthony Coven No.1. She believes political feminism and witchcraft go hand in hand. Feminism is just a political arm of an ancient religion.
Social theorist and feminist activist Simone de Beauvoir mentions Edona (Ishtar) in her book The Second Sex saying she represents the undomesticated, unattached woman. Edona appears in several wiccan liturgies, chants, spells and myths. Edona (Ishtar) is one of the oldest and most perennial goddess figures and comes from ancient Mesopotamia. She is associated with the morning star (just like Lucifer) and the planet Venus. She is now used as an icon for female power and sexual liberation. She was never associated with motherhood or marriage, but rather power hungry and wanted to rule over men and gods. Notorious for treating her lovers sadistically and using her sexuality to control and punish men (Akkadian Epic of Gilgamesh). Simone de Beauvoir has said “no woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children, women shouldn’t have that choice precisely because if there is such a choice too many will make that one.” She was a piece of work, hated Christianity, said pansexuality was the ideal, secular atheist intellectual, hatred of motherhood, strange affairs with other women, one of her students that she seduced later wrote a book called A Disgraceful Affair where she describes being taken advantage of by the much older de Beauvoir and seduced into a relationship with her and de Beauvoir’s husband who had also lost his job for seducing a 17-year-old.
• This feminine spirit, this goddess worship, manifests in countless belief systems (Hinduism, Tibetan Buddhism, ancient Egyptian and Roman and Greek myths, Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah) and Roman Catholicism. In a lot of these manifestations, it is a spirit of rebellion to authority and disdain for men. If you are a Christian then this lines up just dandy with Genesis.
• Many may have heard of the legend of Lilith and her antics. She represents the dark side of this feminine divine. This is why she appears in occult writings of Gerald Gardner and Aleister Crowley. In modern witchcraft she represents female liberation, sexual control, abortion rights and vengeance against men.
• Another well-known one might be Kali the Hindu goddess. She first appeared in Hinduism in 600AD as an angry bloodthirsty reaper of warriors in battle. Portrayed with 4-10 arms usually holding swords and severed men’s heads. Wearing a garland of severed men’s heads around her neck and a belt of severed arms around her waist. Earrings are the corpses of infants. She was on the very first preview issue of new feminist magazine Ms. Magazine in 1972. This seems like an odd choice for a magazine targeted at American housewives. Unless you understand why. It’s interesting that feminist popstars often depict her with what they wear and imitate Kali’s tongue sticking out, even more interesting when you know these same popstars like Miley Cyrus, Lana del Ray, Grimes and Beyonce are self-proclaimed witches. The “women empowerment” song WAP, is heavily symbolic with occult references. Even if you think this is all a laughable joke and conspiracy, there are people out there who take all of it very seriously. An Indian cult called thuggees were in Guiness world records for killing over 2 million people as a sacrifice to Kali. All men. So, we should be kinda worried that there is so much blatant references and tribute to her. The Rolling Stones refer to the cult in Sympathy for the devil “I lay traps for the troubadours before they reached Bombay”, interesting because their logo is Kali’s infamous stuck out tongue.
• Theosophy was another esoteric idea to waltz on in through the floodgate of rebellion thanks to the reformation. Created by Helena Blavatsky who has been accused of making up a lot of her travel stories which she said gave her wisdom form ascended masters. Joy Dixon, author of The Divine Feminine argues that suffrage was inextricably linked to theosophy, with a much higher membership among feminists than the gen pop. She also said much of the messaging and argumentation for suffrage came from theosophy (achieving oneness). Spiritualists, theosophists and feminists all united under the idea that Christianity was an oppressor of women. Which naturally led to the icon of Lucifer being the liberator of women for suffragettes. This is affirmed by Per Faxneld as well in the book Satanic Feminism: Lucifer as the Liberator of Woman. The theosophical society explains the symbols they use as “so ancient that nobody knows when they were first used to express universal ideals.” The symbols include the serpent swallowing its tail, the swastika, the star of David and the ankh, an ancient Egyptian symbol similar to a cross.
• Margaret Fuller was credited with the first major feminist work in America inspiring the suffrage movement and the likes of Elizabeth Katy Stanton and Susan B. Anthony. The book attempted to popularize the idea that woman should be as independent and self-sufficient as possible. That this was the only way to promote equality. She predicted that one day men and women would share a mortgage and that when the sexes reach equality humanity will achieve oneness. And an overarching idea that delineation between the two sexes, a blurring of any differences would also be a result of humanity’s progression. This idea comes up a bit in the motivations of occultists and feminists. She, like Mary Wollstonecraft also travelled Europe, had kids outside of wedlock and had multiple affairs all while ironically complaining about being shackled by the patriarchy. She also shared Wollstonecraft’s disdain for the majority of other women who were perfectly happy not sharing her views.
• Many women who were part of the suffrage movement were also part of the spiritualist movement. “There was hardly a suffragist that never sat at a séance table.” Spiritualism swept America in the 19th century, the Fox sisters tricked their parents into thinking the house was haunted, they eventually started selling out shows, and then people started doing the same.
• Victoria Woodhall aka Mrs. Satan born in 1838. Mother a spiritualist, travelled around ripping off desperate people as a medium and healer. She too believed in the abandoning of social categories in order for humanity to achieve oneness. Her and her sister were guilty of insider trading but playing it off as psychic insight. They were frauds but no feminist acknowledges this. Again, they travelled around and had affairs and did as they pleased all while complaining about the shackles of the patriarchy. They made so much money they started a newspaper and printed the first English version of the communist manifesto.
• The Woman’s Bible, a direct assault on traditional Christianity. The 26 women on the revision committee were all liberal, occultic leaning. Universalists, atheists, theosophists, spiritualists. Hatred of marriage and Christianity another common theme among even the early feminists.
• Another popular suffragist and occultist was Florence Farr and like many of her kind, she was very anti-Christian. About as far from it as you could get. Rachel Wilson “it’s fascinating to me personally that such a famous and well-connected woman who was a prolific writer on women’s liberation was an occult priestess known for her ability to summon powerful demons and nobody talks about it.”
• Another titan of theosophy and feminism was Annie Besant carrying on the work of Helena Blavatsky, also very anti-Christian.
• Alice Bailey married Foster Bailey a 33rd degree freemason and secretary for the theosophical society. They founded Lucifer publishing company, changed it to Lucius publishing and now still exists today as Lucius trust. Like many theosophists, she wrote 24 books which she says were telepathically communicated to her by spiritual masters. She sought to usher in the dawning of a new global consciousness. When the UN was formed in 1942, she saw a chance and immediately started calling for a new world order. She had a tremendous influence from its inception. The UN spiritual caucus is filled with her followers. She wrote a new age occult mantra called the great evocation which was read on a live radio broadcast from the UN building in NY. UN assistant secretary general Robert Muller is a follower of her work and he won a peace prize for a curriculum he made based on education in the new age. Bailey didn’t specifically write a lot on women’s lib but inspired many who did.
• Founder of planned parenthood Margaret Sanger was a Rosicrucian, hung out with famous artists and had multiple affairs, including one with H.G Wells. He was married to his cousin prior to the affair and was one of the most influential writers of the 20th century. He too, became increasingly hostile to religion.
• Marion Zimmer Bradley, feminist fiction writer, considered icon of feminist pop culture, both her children accused her and her husband notorious pedo Walter H Breen of horrific abuses. She founded the Aquarian Order of the Restoration which is based on the work of occultist Dion fortune who was a contemporary associate of Aleister Crowley. She also started the Darkmoon Circle, a pagan witchcraft group that still exists today. Darkmoon Circle is part of The Covenant of the Goddess, an international wiccan organization. She was an avid occult practitioner who took part in witchcraft ceremonies and rituals, she completed a Rosicrucian correspondence course. Feminists accuse the kids of lying about it all but the problem is the accusations are a matter of court records and she confessed to at least knowing about her husbands abuse of the children.
4. Who Funded Feminism?
• So how was it passed if 96% of women in America didn’t want it? Follow the money.
Feminism was an agenda created and pushed by a handful of elite people to reengineer society. They claim to be humanist, socialists all for the good. But they were all funded by bankers, industrialists, wealthy MEN in most cases.
Alva Belmont was a large contributor, she was very wealthy from marrying rich, twice. Not very liberating and independent. She first married William K Vanderbilt, a founding member of the Jekyll Island club, where representatives of the world’s richest men would gather in secret in 1910, to draft legislation to establish central banking under the federal reserve. In 1913, these same elitists also created the income tax, which they snuck in under everyone’s noses during Christmas. Super great for them if they can get women into the workforce as well, just after creating an income tax doubling your profits overnight! Expanding the treasury, driving up the GDP, drive down wages (the more workers, the lower the demand, the lower the wage). In 1930 Germany, they restricted women in workforce because they had an epidemic of joblessness, homelessness, and suicide among men.
They had also just created the compulsory public school system which was perfect to replace the parents while they worked!
Then she married William’s close friend Oliver Belmont who was the son of August Belmont, a wealthy Jewish investment banker for the Rothschilds just as his father U.S congressman Perry Belmont did. He was a member of his father’s banking firm and two elite secret societies ‘The Lambs’ and the ‘Sons of the Revolution’. The Lambs is America’s oldest theatrical club and a precursor to the Screen Actor’s Guild, the institution which now runs Hollywood.
Another funder that helped get the 19th amendment passed was Pheobe Hearst. She too had very strange theosophy like beliefs where all of humanity and the distinctions between us need to be blended together to evolve and achieve spiritual oneness. She envisioned a one world language, government and religion.
Nelson Rockefeller created an experimental social science university in the 70s in NYC. Even the state said it was too crazy and defunded it. A few from there were moved over to the University of Chicago (created and funded by Rockefeller) with other radical feminists. It spread through the academic world because these are the entities that give people professorships and study grants.
Sanger opened her clinical research bureau with funding from John D. Rockefeller in 1923. The Rockefellers continue to offer funding for her clinics which eventually became worldwide as planned parenthood international. John had already opened the bureau for social hygiene which was an organization that supported population control and eugenics. He too wanted all protestant sects to merge and become a singular entity. He donated the land for the UN HQ in Manhattan, which houses the new ae interfaith spiritual caucus.
5. Feminism Did Not Improve the World
• Just as feminists in the 19th century were caught up in spiritualism, the feminists of the 20th century got caught up in eugenics
Planned parenthood found Margaret Sanger had shocking views that feminists today downplay and lie about how she died to justify her questionable beliefs. They say she died of all her pregnancies but actually died of tuberculosis. And she very likely fabricated many of her anecdotes that she uses to push her agenda of birth control.
Sanger had to align herself with even more questionable people then her to realize her dream of a pill that would prevent pregnancy. She had a publication called the birth control review which featured work from Ernst Ruden, who studied psychiatry with Emil Kraepelin, the father of modern scientific psychiatry. Again, Rockefeller was responsible for funding them and establishing their work. They were eugenicists and advocated for ‘racial hygiene’. A theory of social Darwinian eugenics that Rockefeller was promoting in America. Ruden was a member of the Nazi “expert committee on questions of population and racial policy” where he argued for the sterilization of people considered mentally or physically unfit. He was also a member of the Nazi party and received 2 awards for his work in eugenics directly from Adolph Hitler. He gave speeches where he spoke of the value of eliminating young children of clearly inferior quality, ideas of which Sanger shares in her book Woman and the New Race. “The most merciful thing a large family does to one of its infants is to kill it.” She enlisted the financial help of her friend Katharine McCormick who was a former suffragette. Sanger referred to motherhood as slavery and a great quote that sums her up is “but for my view, I believe that there should be no more babies.”
• Abortion advocates have very often falsified data to push their goals.
They said tens of thousands of women died as a result of illegal abortions, but Dr Bernard Nathanson cofounder of the National Abortion rights action league and director of the largest abortion clinic in the world during the 70’s said leading abortion proponents knew the figures were false but felt it was useful as a PR tactic.
Even statisticians from planned parenthood admitted that abortion deaths were accurately kept prior to legalization. In 1972, there were 39 deaths, not thousands.
And the deaths from abortion have INCREASED since being legalized, mostly because abortion rates sky rocketed after being made legal. Independent studies have found that the cause of death if from abortion has been hidden or misrepresent on death certificates. Researchers from Finland found that 94% maternal deaths related to abortion were not identified as such from death certificates alone.
• So much societal damage
In 1960, 5% of births were outside of wedlock, as of 2010, that increased to 41%.
In 2012, 1/3 of American kids did not live with their biological father. The risks of growing up without fathers has been studied extensively and the results are clear. Poor outcomes by a whopping margin. 90% of homeless kids come from fatherless houses, 85% of behavioral disorders are in fatherless kids. 70% of kids in juvenile centers were fatherless, 71% of teens that abuse substances fatherless.
Another outcome is that they often end up living with their mother’s boyfriends and are statistically far more likely to suffer more frequent and severe abuse. The lowest rates of abuse are found in a stable, two biological parent household. Are Patriarchs Perpetrators or Protectors? (substack.com)
In a 2012 study called The Effects of Family Structure on Mental Health in Children, out of 154 kids admitted to a behavioral health center, only 11% of kids came from intact families. The other 89% had a disruption to traditional family structure. 2/3 exposed to trauma, physical abuse in 36%, clearly highlights adverse effects on mental health of children that come from disrupted traditional family.
An interesting fact is that mothers are more often the child abusers. While feminists will justify this by saying its because mothers spend the most time with the kids that’s why it appears that way. But since 1980 men have gotten 4 times more custody, if men were the problem the rates would have showed it. It should have gone up, especially in those living with their father only. But they didn’t, they even go down. All risk factors for children increase when their father isn’t in the home.
Historically female leaders have been more hawkish when it comes to war, we have examples of when women have power over people, they’re more likely to exploit them. Nuns in orphanages are great evidence, but also female guards in juvie facilities, 90% of the abuses happening in those facilities are from the female guards, in women’s prisons you see higher rates of assault from women on women than you do in men’s prisons. Among lesbian couples, rates of abuse much higher. This is because men socialize their aggression at an early age, very beneficial, makes them more empathetic and measured in their emotional control. They learn what happens when you don’t have control over your physical force.
Professor Edward Dutton, rise of an empire right when it peaks feminism emerges and it collapses. Roman empire, byzantine.
• Government/elitists raise the kids instead of the mother
Children now overwhelmingly in the west grow up in day care rather than at home with mothers, in 1940 the number of children under 6 with mothers working full time outside home was 6%, in 2013 that’s 58%.
Us govt welfare spending risen with out of wedlock births, has gone from 50b in 1950 to 700b in 2010.
Everything is set up for both parents to work and children to be in daycare then public school.
95% of all the time you’ll ever spend with your children is gone by the time they turn 18. That’s gone and you never get it back. I realized this might be why kids go thru a rebellious phase because they get brought up by the state that tries to incite that. I wonder if a rebellious phase was a thing before that? Even if you have to downsize and live humbly to stay at home with them, it would totally be worth it. Plus, there’s a whole second half of life once your kids are adults! Statistically you’ve got another 40 years.
• Eroded the Value of Marriage
Which is extremely bad given its importance in raising the next generation
Many feminists and suffragettes in their writings talk about wanting to dissolve the institution or at least redefine it.
They were all socialist/communist leaning. This Marxist desire for utopia. Which means getting rid of private property and having everything be administered by the state. And everything is passed down through the paternal lineage, men work and accumulate resources to pass down, so that needed to be disincentivized so those assets go to the state.
• Breeding is coming to a standstill
Many countries are well below replacement birth rates thanks to overpopulation hysteria and anti-natalist policies like one child policy and abortion laws.
And NGO’s are working on the countries left that aren’t under replacement rates (Africa, India).
In the next 3 years (2023 right now) we are going to see something completely unprecedented in human history. Half of women of child-bearing age, aren’t having children. If you have population collapse, you can’t keep the food chain supply and the world running. That’s why in places like Japan where they have the abundance of old people and not enough young people to look after them, there are more and more euthanasia programs.
• Women will vote for safety
As Rachel Wilson points out, “women are much more prone to favor safety and security over risk whereas men are more willing to take a risk if they see benefit”, meaning politicians who want to expand the power of the state infinitely would “want as many women voting as possible” and they eventually went on to become the main voting block in the 80’s.
• Feminism has only made women UNHAPPY, (which should have been obvious result considering what Susan B Anthony said in the first chapter of her previously mentioned book).
2009 paper called The Paradox of Female Happiness caused quite a stir when it was released by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The abstract says “despite objective measures of wellbeing in America over the prior 35 years increasing, the subjective overall happiness among women in the study had decreased both absolutely and relative to the happiness of men.”
Thanks feminists! And we’re not done yet!
After a century of women’s liberation, the U.S Department of Human Health and Services report that more than 1 in 5 American women are diagnosed with a mental health condition during their lifetime.
And are twice as likely to be depressed as men.
The CDC showed disordered alcohol use among American women more than doubled from 2002 to 2013.
The NIH shows that fetal alcohol syndrome rose 2 and a half times from 1996 to 2018.
Polling on gen z, 58% of women said starting career more important than family. It just never gets pointed out that this horrific prioritization of values is a huge factor in women’s worsening mental health.
What were they trying to liberate women from? In reality, they have made it so much harder for mums to stay home and raise kids. Families could live off 1 income.
Any metric where women are happier, is only because of the industrial revolution not feminism. Oh, and who is responsible for the industrial revolution and technological advancement? Not women…
Kommentare